Tag Archives: pat

Pat Robertson: Did molestation or movies make your daughter a lesbian?

Another day, another bat-shit crazy televangelist. I know these come a dime a dozen, and that a majority of people listening to Pat Robertson’s remarks would be appalled, but I find it worthwhile to call out this blatant ignorance. After all, it could only result in making these extreme religious viewpoints look more ridiculous to more people, which can only be a good thing.

This week, Pat Robertson had some serious advice to give to a concerned mother of a twenty-one year old woman who announced she was in a lesbian relationship. “(She) was always very feminine. This came out of nowhere!” wrote the concerned parent. Naturally, Robertson had some interesting words for this mother, which aligned perfectly with his history of total ignorance and idiocy. “I think she needs somebody to help her get her identity straight,” Robertson offered. “She may not be right in this. She may have thought she had a crush on some older girl along the way and that she is actually homosexual when she is not. I don’t know… The whole question of sexuality identity has gotten so blurred in the press these days it’s hard to know… but why is she that way? Was she molested when she was younger?”

It was at this point that the interviewer chimed in with “… Sometimes just in the world today, you know they’re telling kids to explore. It’s crazy.”

Robertson continued: “Girl on girl movies, more and more… They’re getting straight actors to play lesbians and straight men to play homosexuals. And if you say anything against homosexuality, you are just hooted out of court. But I do think you need to love your daughter and give her a chance to work this out. Because if she is deeper and deeper in it, sooner or later she’s gonna be disillusioned and she’s gonna say ‘This is wrong and I want to come out of it.’”

This is not the first time we’ve heard Pat Robertson weigh-in on homosexuality. In 2009, a similar question was asked by the parents of a gay son. “First of all, I’m not at all persuaded that so-called homosexuals are homosexuals because of biological problems,” Robertson stated. “There may be a very few, but there’s so many that have been made homosexual because of a coach or a guidance counselor, or some other male figure who may have abused them, and they think there’s something wrong with their sexuality.” Robertson went on to suggest that the parents continue to love their son because “Well, I mean, if somebody’s on their way to hell, they’ll… I mean, you’ve got to love them to rescue them.”

What we see here is a classic example of one’s religion enabling them to ignore logic and instead spew hate-speech that they deem holy. This is the same man who has called the separation of church and state “insane,” has repeatedly claimed that natural disasters were god’s punishment for various things including abortion, and has claimed that all non-Christian religions worship “demonic powers.” This man also claimed that Mitt Romney would win the 2012 Presidential election because “the lord told him.”

It seems as though whatever lord Pat Robertson is speaking with seems to continuously get it wrong, doesn’t it?

In the same sense that religious extremists don’t need to justify their belief system to me, I find it absolutely unnecessary to justify my homosexuality to anybody. Especially when we are looking at the dichotomy and the logical fallacies that exist so prominently in their arguments. Robertson states “(Your twenty-one year old daughter) may have thought she had a crush on some older girl along the way and that she is actually homosexual when she is not…”

First of all, I find it interesting that Robertson inferred that the young woman had a crush on an “older girl.” At no point was it ever even implied that the young woman was dating or wanting to date an older woman. Secondly, I am hearing more and more about these Christian conservatives acknowledging homosexuality and claiming acceptance, except when it comes to their own family. Maybe she thinks she is actually homosexual when she is not? That implies that there is a group of people who are “actually homosexual,” but god forbid it be your daughter. No – your daughter, who was brought up in the church, knows better and is exempt from potentially being homosexual because her religion forbids it.

As for his claim that there are more and more “girl on girl movies” and that “they’re getting straight actors to play lesbians and straight men to play homosexuals,” that is correct. Homosexuality is a real thing that is being depicted as a real thing in our media. If the media had any effect on sexual orientation, then I suppose there is no question that myself and every other gay person would have grown up straight, considering there has been heterosexuality expressed in every single movie since the beginning of time, right?

Finally, the absurd falsehood that homosexuals must have been sexually abused is entirely unfounded. In fact, each single study done on the matter has concluded that there seems to be no greater incidence of sexual abuse in the LGBT community. I’m sure this is what the lord would want you to do, however. Find a way to link homosexuality to perversion. How wonderfully Christian of you.

Is anybody else growing entirely weary of heterosexual crazies offering their opinions on homosexuality? We’ve established they are as off-base as everything else that comes out of their mouths. I find, personally, that watching the slow, painful death of this glorified bigotry is actually quite entertaining.

Jonah Hill, we forgive you. This is who we don’t forgive.

It has been widely reported that actor Jonah Hill used a homophobic slur against a harassing photographer, yelling “Suck my d***, f*****!” This retort was shocking, coming from Jonah Hill, a funny-man that many members of the LGBTQ community know and love. Well, Jonah took the opportunity to offer an incredibly sincere apology, both on Howard Stern, as well as on The Tonight Show with Jimmy Fallon.

Since Jonah’s remarks, the blogosphere has lit up with some people inevitably claiming that Hill only apologized as a good career move. Twitter blew up with comments that Hill is a “bad actor,” and that he needs to “do better.” Many panned his apology, claiming the word was “part of his vernacular,” and calling it “the classic ‘I have gay friends’ excuse.’”

I beg to differ. Have these people forgotten that in November 2013, in response to the Sochi olympics, Jonah Hill became one of many celebrities to sport a t-shirt with the phrase “Love conquers hate” scrawled in Russian? “Help us show Russia & the world that #LoveConquersHate,” Jonah tweeted. “Visit http://loveconquershate.org and @HRC to see how you can help.”

This is not the move of a man who is homophobic. Jonah’s slurs were clearly the result of poor judgment after being berated, harassed, and chastised by an unprofessional paparazzi. We here at GWOG are happy to accept Jonah’s apology, and thank him for his continued support of the LGBT community.

If the blogosphere is looking for somebody to truly be offended by, perhaps we should take a look at some other comments that were made public in recent history?

Conservative media mogul Pat Robertson publicly stated that women are to reward husbands with sex for doing chores around the house. This is in addition, of course, to his August 2013 assertion that gay people with AIDS wear rings that cut fingers and infect others during handshakes. No apology was issued.

Last month, Mississippi Judge Bill Weisenberger is reported to have repeatedly slapped a young mentally-challenged African-American man, who was seeking work in a local flea market, while yelling racial slurs, including “Run, N*****, Run!” No comment was made to the media, despite several eye-witness accounts, though the judge is currently under investigation.

Also last month, Florida representative Charles Van Zant attacked the controversial education standard “Common Core,” by stating that those who implement Common Core “will promote double-mindedness in state education and attract every one of your children to become as homosexual as they possibly can.” No further explanation nor apology was issued.

It was also reported in May that New Hampshire police chief Robert Copeland used the ’N-word’ in reference to President Obama. Instead of issuing an apology, however, he sent an e-mail to his fellow commissioners, stating “I believe I did use the ‘N’ word in reference to the current occupant of the White house. For this, I do not apologize — he meets and exceeds my criteria for such.” Without comment, but following a public outcry, Comissioner Copeland resigned.

Late last year, our favorite Tea Party princess, Sarah Palin, compared our national debt to slavery. When questioned later by CNN’s Jake Tapper, Palin suggested that perhaps people didn’t understand the definition of slavery, stating the following: “I’m sure if we open up the dictionary, we could prove that with semantics that are various, we can prove that there is a definition of slavery that absolutely fits the bill there, when I’m talking about a bankrupt country that will owe somebody something down the line if we don’t change things that is, we will be shackled. We will be enslaved to those who we owe.” Don’t worry, she was certain to preface her ignorant comments with a warning: “This isn’t racist.”

Let us also not forget about the blatant homophobia I discussed in last weeks blog, Dear Adam Carolla, “Shut the Fuck Up!” (An Open Letter)

With all this in mind, it seems to me that Jonah Hill’s transgression is fairly benign, considering the degree of harassment to which he was responding. His apology not only seems incredibly sincere, but he has been sure to issue it on several high-profile media platforms, including ABC’s Good Morning America, Howard Stern, and The Tonight Show with Jimmy Fallon.

If the general public wants to vilify somebody, aren’t we clearly looking in the wrong direction?